http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3417





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-05-26 10:04 -------
>A "correct" solution would be to make a new RR,
>say "MS" which you can then use to specify senders since they are quite
>commonly different than the hosts that receive mail.  This is what SPF
>does, right now using TXT records, but there is talk about creating a
>new RR for this purpose.

Why special priority 65535 for this MX records is not "correct" solution?

What rules should be included in SpamAssasin - that represent correct "solution"
or that effective on current traffic?



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to