http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3443
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-30 01:38 ------- If I replace the kill -15 used by stop_spamd with kill -2 (i.e., use SIGINT instead of SIGTERM, which have the same handler defined in spamd) as well as take care of the race condition by adding the unlink mentioned in the earlier comment, then all of the tests except spamd_hup.t work. That one still exits without going through the signal handler. Presumably having stop_spamd send a SIGINT instead of a SIGTERM would be just as good on non-Cygwin systems. Does anyone have a reason not to change it? Of course we would still need to figure out why spamd_hup.t doesn't work with it, and maybe discovering that would provide a solution to the SIGTERM case too. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
