http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3483
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-14 13:33 -------
Subject: Re: [review] bayes _journal not syncing to _toks
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:05:41PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> X-Spam-Bayes-Result: 0.5
> X-Spam-Bayes-Token-Summary: Bayes not run.
>
> That seem to be conflicting information there. I'm not sure if that plays
> into
No, that's fine actually. The Bayes probability of 0.5 means
"unknown/undeterminable", which you'd get with no tokens in the DB.
> in Bayes.pm or not... seeing $score is defined, it bypasses skip: ? but
> that
> is in Bayes::scan(), which I dont even think it makes it that far.
right. it goes to skip at is_scan_available() at the top of the function.
> maybe an unrelated bug, or is result set to default to 0.5 even if bayes
> cannot run?
FYI: your output there is actually not from the bayes code but the header
macro code in PerMsgStatus:
BAYES => sub {
defined($self->{bayes_score}) ?
sprintf("%3.4f", $self->{bayes_score}) : "0.5"
},
so internally, the bayes score is undefined, then for display that
becomes 0.5. :)
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
