Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > > > > These schemes already exist and have been discussed (and used by some > > folks). I've tried it myself. The problem is many mailing lists doing > > sender verification barf all over it ... like this one. > > Yes :-( I'm working on a system which uses fixed envelope addresses for > those particular problem recipient addresses, and variable ones for > everyone else. I'm hoping that it will be easy enough for the average > user, though they'll have to frob their mailing list subscriptions a bit > when they turn the feature on.
Yeah, from my perspective, that's less optimal since you have to keep updating it over time. Using VERP would be optimal if not for programs doing sender verification on MAIL FROM (which I think is broken). Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
