Re: blowback procmail rule

[Sidney Markowitz]

Don't you need to use the :0 HB in the rule, or even better do something 
with separate :0 and :0 B rules for those that are looking in the 
headers of the bounce message and those that are looking for your 
original mail inside the body?

Also, I seem to recall that when I tried this that some mail servers did 
not include the entire original message or even all the original headers 
in the bounceback message, but now experimenting I haven't reproduced 
that. Does anyone else have any specific examples of a good bounce that 
doesn't include the original headers in the body or does something 
strange like BASE64 encodes it?

 -- sidney