> I think we'd like to also know that it produces exactly the same results
> for checking/learning/dumping.

Sure - I'll have some benchmarks ready for you by tomorrow.

> It was getting too hard to support N-different local DBM modules so we
> went with the one that worked the best overall.

I had a hard time getting the other alternatives running, some are fairly
outdated. My patch is fairly simple, DB/SDBM coexistance wouldn't be a
biggy.

Chris

-- 
SpamIntelligence for Outlook(tm): Beta now available at www.spamint.com

Reply via email to