http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3706
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-26 08:39 -------
Ok, that leads somewher:
First:
terminal1$ spamd -c -D -p 1025
[...]
Than, after spamd has successfully started:
terminal2$ spamc -p 1025 < sample-nonspam.txt
[...]
Upon that command in terminal2, we note in terminal1:
[...]
debug: bayes: found bayes db version 0
debug: bayes: detected bayes db format 0, upgrading
[...]
debug: bayes: upgraded database format from v0 to v2 in 97 seconds
debug: bayes: upgrading database format from v2 to v3
[...]
debug: bayes: upgraded database format from v2 to v3 in 180 seconds
[...]
logmsg: clean message (0.2/5.0) for js:1001 in 285.9 seconds, 6494 bytes.
So now the bayes db is apparently updated. Great, let's run the check again.
It runs fast now. However, when spamd was run as root (as in the initial
report), consecutive runs took equally long. Isn't the user's bayes db
updated in that scenario?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
