Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is hard to judge decisions made by SA people, when I'm not following > the discussions there closely. From amavisd-new standpoint it is > certainly unfortunately if SA must no longer be called with perl > in -T mode. This certainly worked in SA version so far, and perhaps > it would not be too much work to keep this nice behaviour.
SA has never supported being run with taint checks turned on. It just happened to work for *some* versions. It didn't work with 2.20 either. > I can only appeal to the SA people to consider keeping SA > operational in the taint-checking mode, as it was so far (and like > Vipul's Razor is now - due to popular demand, but wasn't in the > distant past) I'm definitely in favor of supporting running with taint checks turned on; once we get it working, we need to make it the default. http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=449 Dan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
