Aaahhh...oops...i'm not running through Amavis. Please ignore my last reply.
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Mike Leone wrote: > * Avi Schwartz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 20, 02 at 23:57: > > Is SA supposed to always insert a X-Spam-Status tag? > > > > I just started using SA + Postfix + amavisd-new and it seems to me that > > SA does not insert this tag into non-spam messages. Is this correct? > > Correct. Amavisd-new only adds the header to spam. You can change this in > the code. This was answered this week on the amavis mailing list; check > their archives. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
