Rich Duzenbury ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 11/25/02 at 18:43: > > > > >Auto-bouncing spam also auto-bounces FPs, and you lose legitmate mail. Tag > >everything with SA, and no need to change addresses; simply route all > >tagged mail to a special folder, which you check every few days. You never > >lose any mail, and you get to retreive any FPs, and you don't get to see > >the spam except for the spam subject lines over a small amount of time > >every few days. > > > >Big difference, really. > > I don't believe this. I've been using SA for quite awhile and I can't > remember the last FP I got. So, fairly recently, I changed my procmail > setup so that I keep those that score between 5 and 9, everything over nine > goes out the window. About 54% of the spam I get scores more than 9.
AH. This is different from what you said before. Bouncing over 9 may probably be all right, since such a high scoring spam is almost certainly spam. However, bouncing anything over 5 I still maintain is a bad idea. Like you, I hardly ever get FPs anymore, but I do still very occasionally get them. Altho mostly on mailing list posts, not on "individual" mail. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project <http://leaf.sourceforge.net> AIM: MikeLeone Public Key - <http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc> Registered Linux user# 201348 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
