thank you and martin for quantitating this. but...
should i read this as 76.8% of total messages received were caught by razor? (should i believe that only 100%-97.4% of your messages are non-spam, only 111 messages in the last month? maybe i don't understand what the *total* represents.) (also can you explain either where the stats come from or what "scores", "razor not sa" and "razor cause sa" mean? "razor cause sa" does not hit in google, so i suspect it's your own stats script...) On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 03:02:25PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:27:42PM +0000, Martin Radford wrote: > > Be that as it may, I still find that around 50% of my spam is caught > > by Razor. > > Stats since 2002-12-09 > Scores : 0.7 19 45 > Total Messages: 4213 > SA Caught : 4102 (97.4 %) > Razor Caught : 3237 (76.8 %) > Razor Not SA : 1 (0.0 %) > Razor Cause SA: 87 (2.1 %) > > -- > Randomly Generated Tagline: > "Advice is kind of like sex. It's not always good, it's not always free > and you don't always get from the person you want to get it from." > - Peter Liam Taylor ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
