At 12:12 PM 6/6/2003 -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:

> At 09:10 AM 6/6/2003 -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> >Before I file a bugzilla about this ...
> >
> >debug: Score set 3 chosen.
> >
> >That means SA thinks network tests are not in use, but as the trace
> >continues after the scoreset is already chosen I find ...
>
> Score set 3 is the 4th scoreset mentioned in the docs, which is bayes AND
> network.

Duh, right.  OK, then the problem is that it doesn't actually seem to be
using score set 3, it's using score set 2.

/usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf:score BANG_BOSS 0.710 0.0 1.887 0.407
                                                     ^^^^^ ^^^ !!!!! ^^^^^
                                                 set   0    1    2     3

The verbose report shows BANG_BOSS as having contributed 1.9 points, which
does not correspond to the score set that was chosen.

Fair enough.. Did you try this same test using the command-line SA, or does this problem only show up for incoming mail?


By any chance do you have "skip_rbl_checks" set in your local.cf, or called SA with the -l parameter?

Have you forced the RBL test scores to 0?

The "debug: is DNS available? 1" tells us that network checks are possible, but does not tell us if they are actually enabled or not, and also there's the possibility that when SA is run on the command line with debugging enabled that you are using a different user_prefs, or even a different copy of SA than what you use for mail processing (root users will generally not have /usr/local/bin in their path, but non-root users will have it ahead of /usr/bin).








------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to