So then this list is not setup properly because it is not even issuing a Reply-To: Header. My Mail server is placing one in there to make up for this discrepency
Reply-To: is an *optional* header. It is not the job of a mailing list to add one, it is the job of the senders email program to add or not add one. Most (but not all) do. If Reply-To: doesn't exist, your email program will (should) reply to the From: header.
Unfortunately your mail system, probably MDaemon, is taking the Return-Path: header address which is *only* used for mail delivery failure reports, and adding it as a Reply-To: header. This is *wrong* and against the RFC's.
Please don't waste time blaiming the list, rather find out why your mailserver system is incorrectly changing headers...
Regards, Simon
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
