At 06:13 PM 6/9/03 -0700, Ben Johansen wrote:
So then this list is not setup properly because it is not even issuing a Reply-To: Header. My Mail server is placing one in there to make up for this discrepency
*cough* Read Yer RFC's man RFC 2822 Section 3.6.2 is VERY clear about all this.
http://rfc-2822.rfclist.net/rfc-2822-21.htm
1) the Reply-To header is optional, not required.
2) The Reply-to header intended to be specified by message originators, should they desire replies to go to an alternate address. Although some mailing lists engage in the dubious practice of munging reply-to's, this is something that sourceforge explicitly refuses to do because of the mail loops it can cause, and it is technically speaking a violation of RFC's for a mail list to do so.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
