I have something like this happen occasionally (once out of about 20k messages scanned). Started when I moved spamd to a different server (spamd was on the same server spamc was being called from).
I see this in /var/log/maillog whenever I notice a message without any markup: Oct 12 05:45:04 green spamc[10414]: failed sanity check, 7123 bytes claimed, -1 bytes seen The message that error is related to gets delivered without any SA markup. I checked back through maillogs for the year prior to moving spamd to a different server and I did not find any of those errors...and never noticed any messages not having SA markup. It's definately related to having spamd on a remote server. At least for me. :-) I've done spamd debugs and logged full debug output for messages that "fail sanity check". spamd never complains about anything, message is scanned and completed without any errors from spamd. * Jason Brunette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Excel.Net,Inc. - http://www.excel.net/ * (920) 452-0455 - Sheboygan/Plymouth area * (888) 489-9995 - Other areas, toll-free > -----Original Message----- > From: Rich Puhek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:25 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 occasionally does no markup on spam > > > I've been running my email through SA 2.60 to test my installation > before converting all our users. Things have been running great, with > one exception. On occasion, a spam will slip through, with > absolutely no > SA markup in the headers or subject line. > > I've tried manually piping the messages in question through > spamassassin, and I receive "good" output (SA tags the message). > > I call spamc from procmail as follows: > > :0fw > * < 700000 > |/usr/bin/spamc -s 700000 -d <test_machine_ip> -p 783 > > The messages are not overly large, so they're not bypassing > the size limit. > > I turned on debugging in spamd, and didn't see anything too > out of the > ordinary, aside from an unable to parse bayes_path message. I > did see a > message complaining about the Pyzor response, but SA seems to have > continued running just fine, even learing the message as spam. > > spamd log output is below. Any ideas? > > Thanks! > > --Rich > [spamd log snipped] > > _________________________________________________________ > > Rich Puhek > ETN Systems Inc. > 2125 1st Ave East > Hibbing MN 55746 > > tel: 218.262.1130 > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
