-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gorm,
Saturday, November 29, 2003, 1:52:13 PM, you wrote: GJ> Bayes is working very well for me, but I am concerned about poisoning GJ> the database with extraneous, obfuscating words that many spam GJ> messages contain. I used to be concerned about this. Because of it I 1) increased my auto-learn spam threshold to 30, and 2) didn't feed spam which contained visible poison to Bayes. For the past month or so I've fed just about EVERY email I can to bayes, including all poison, all obfuscation, etc. The only emails I don't feed to bayes are spam bounces (bounced to [EMAIL PROTECTED] where there is no xyz). I get hundreds of these, and don't want Bayes to learn that bounces are spam. With that one exception, everything is fed to Bayes, and I have no problem at all with Bayes working here. Bob Menschel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0 iQA/AwUBP8l2e5ebK8E4qh1HEQK4SgCeOdenR1OyYrDMz2kbJknrqe57El0AoP7o pP2YwRqX8auAu15GQ4u1MtTx =yMdT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
