David Gibbs said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Is there an sa recipe for this latest innovation, with body as follows?
>
> This spam seems to be designed to bypass bayesian analysis ... and it
> appears to work. Almost every piece of spam like this I've seen has the
> BAYES_00 rule, which has a negative score.
FYI, a well maintained bayes DB should not get BAYES_00 on a significant
number of spam, even bayes busters. Here are my bayes stats from my
verified spam folder for the last 500 spam which includes many bayes
busters:
1 BAYES_00
1 BAYES_10
1 BAYES_40
6 BAYES_44
22 BAYES_50
5 BAYES_56
7 BAYES_60
11 BAYES_70
5 BAYES_80
33 BAYES_90
395 BAYES_99
Most bayes busters score bayes_99. The bayes_10 is a monster.com-like
spam, similar to ham I receive. The bayes_00 was a misclassified ham, an
image only forward from a friend (doh, gotta fix that one).
--
Chris Thielen
Easily generate SpamAssassin rules to catch obfuscated spam phrases:
http://www.sandgnat.com/cmos/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
