Jeez; I just read my own post, and thought a little clarification might be in order: the "IMHO, no" is in response to "Is there any reason NOT to use BigEvil", and not in response to the subject line.
Is it Friday yet?! Apparently my brain already thinks it's Saturday and is camped out somewhere drinking Guinness without the rest of me... Sheesh. Rubin On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 15:17, Rubin Bennett wrote: > IMHO, no. I think BigEvil is good enough for general use (I am running > it on about a dozen sites, one of whom is an ISP with about 500 > customers). > > My $0.02 > > Rubin > > On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 13:34, Bert Rapp wrote: > > I've been half heartedly watching the list and have noticed some BigEvil > > updates. So, I looked at the bigevil site > > (http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm). Is there any > > reason I would not want to use bigevil? > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. > > Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering > > advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. > > Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html > > _______________________________________________ > > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk -- Rubin Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RB Technologies
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
