On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Robert Menschel uttered the following: > Yes, there are three reasons you might not want to use bigevil. > > 1) You like getting spam. > > 2) You run SA with a threshold level very different from the default 5.0 > score, and don't have the time or ability to adjust the bigevil scores > accordingly. > > 3) You are an end-user whose only control is through the user_prefs file, > and therefore you cannot add additional rules to your SA processing.
4) you prefer to have such a large collection of rule/score combinations GAed before use, and consider a system that relies on some poor sod manually maintaining a huge list of regexes, with (as far as I can tell) decidedly ad-hoc hit-frequencies checking, to be a step backwards. (No offence, Chris. You're doing a hell of a job, but it seems like you're engaged in a Red Queen's race to me :) ) -- As they say, build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door. But nobody ever got anywhere outlawing mice. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
