Michael D Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I posted those examples, such as they are, as evidence that I really get > AWL scores that high -- since some skeptics argued that that is not > possible. In fact, so far, everybody has accepted my examples as > examples of high AWL scores. To now argue that they are inadequate > examples of else, is arguably perverse ;>
Yes, I believe that you have gotten AWL adjustments of -25, but they're irrelevant to the problem. They're not causing spam to be miscategorized, so those high AWL adjustments don't matter. They're a natural side effect of high scores. You haven't posted the details of cases where AWL has caused miscategorization, but I don't believe that the AWL adjustment in those cases is anything like -25. -- Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Washington, DC
