----- Original Message -----
From: "tBB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 2004 March, 17 01:30
Subject: Re[2]: Habeas (again)
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:18:35 -0500
> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Quite frankly, I'm absolutely shocked to hear that there's anyone on the
> > list who hasn't reduced the score of this rule, or zeroed it out yet.
For
>
> *cough* I'm sorry to shock you again :) but I haven't reduced the score
> too and to be honest, I see currently no reason to do so. I just searched
> thru my recent spamfolder (6853 msgs, several countrys) and there was
> not even a single forged HABEAS header.
>
> Nico
Hm, I searched both my ham and my spam recently on a single day's mass
of messages, about 1000. I had equal numbers of spam and ham that had
the marking. ALL the ham postings were to this one list. The spam was
from several different senders but not 11 of them.
That's why I have temporarily placed the score at plus 1 rather than
the -8 or so it started out with. My attention was drawn to habeas
on an escaped spam about a month ago. I've been sort of following it
since. I'm not sure how they are going to go after Chinese or Korean
spammers who violate the terms of their copyright.
{^_^}
