Bob George Sent Wednesday, March 17, 2004 7:20 AM
> I'm not giving up on habeas yet though. I've been in touch with a couple
> of folks over there, and they're still fighting the good fight. I do not
> intent to participate in their downfall by advocating assigning them
> spammy-scores, though lower hammy-scores may be appropriate.
I too, am not giving up. But I do need to lower the score so they don't keep
slipping through. However, I delete my spam so any Habeas infringers would
just get deleted unless I can still have them delivered to me so I can
report them. Can anyone help me out with a Procmail recipe that would pass
along anything deemed to be spam but that has the habeas headers? I still
want to be able to report that.
Currently, I use something like this:
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
| spamc -u yadda...
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes.*DELETE_SPAM
/dev/null
(The DELETE_SPAM bit just checks to see if the email contains DELETE_SPAM.
My users can turn on spam deleting by essentially setting the DELETE_SPAM
custom rule (which matches all email) to a score of .01)
Thanks much.
cheers,
Colin
Colin A. Bartlett
Kinetic Web Solutions
www.kineticweb.biz
