On Wednesday 16 June 2004 16:06, Asif Iqbal might have typed:
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 6573 invoked by uid 7801); 16 Jun 2004 13:57:00 -0000
> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by qmail by uid 7791 with
> qmail-scanner-1.22st (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.63.
Content analysis details: (5.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_71 BODY: {7}Letter - punctuation - {1}Letter
1.3 ALL_NATURAL BODY: Spam is 100% natural?!
3.0 SPAMCOP_URI_RBL URI's domain in sc.surbl.org
[diet40.com is blacklisted in URI RBL at]
[sc.surbl.org]
0.5 RCVD_IN_KOREA RBL: Received from Korea
[210.181.14.152 listed in korea.blackholes.us]
SURBL is useful :) If I re-test using Bayes:
Content analysis details: (8.6 points, 4.3 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_71 BODY: {7}Letter - punctuation - {1}Letter
2.4 ALL_NATURAL BODY: Spam is 100% natural?!
2.1 BAYES_90 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 90 to 99%
[score: 0.9897]
3.0 SPAMCOP_URI_RBL URI's domain in sc.surbl.org
[diet40.com is blacklisted in URI RBL at]
[sc.surbl.org]
0.5 RCVD_IN_KOREA RBL: Received from Korea
[210.181.14.152 listed in korea.blackholes.us]
