Duncan Hill wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2004 16:06, Asif Iqbal might have typed:
> > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Received: (qmail 6573 invoked by uid 7801); 16 Jun 2004 13:57:00 -0000
> > Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by qmail by uid 7791 with
> > qmail-scanner-1.22st (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.63.
>
> Content analysis details: (5.4 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
> 0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_71 BODY: {7}Letter - punctuation - {1}Letter
> 1.3 ALL_NATURAL BODY: Spam is 100% natural?!
> 3.0 SPAMCOP_URI_RBL URI's domain in sc.surbl.org
> [diet40.com is blacklisted in URI RBL at]
> [sc.surbl.org]
> 0.5 RCVD_IN_KOREA RBL: Received from Korea
> [210.181.14.152 listed in korea.blackholes.us]
>
>
> SURBL is useful :) If I re-test using Bayes:
>
Now here is a newbie question, how do I add these rules ?
> Content analysis details: (8.6 points, 4.3 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
> 0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_71 BODY: {7}Letter - punctuation - {1}Letter
> 2.4 ALL_NATURAL BODY: Spam is 100% natural?!
> 2.1 BAYES_90 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 90 to 99%
> [score: 0.9897]
> 3.0 SPAMCOP_URI_RBL URI's domain in sc.surbl.org
> [diet40.com is blacklisted in URI RBL at]
> [sc.surbl.org]
> 0.5 RCVD_IN_KOREA RBL: Received from Korea
> [210.181.14.152 listed in korea.blackholes.us]
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
