Chris Santerre wrote:
*huge snip*
First, this has been discussed. To many issues with FPs here for virtually
hosted domains.
I missed the discussion and could not find it in the archive :-(
My proposal was to do it with care but maybe we could do it with *great* care
and give it a relatively low score (e.g. 1.0).
I did some further investigation: The spammer had URIs that - when retrieved - were _redirected_ to www.ASStraffic.com and www.MILFriders.com which are included in the free URL database in the "adult section" (www.milfriders.com resolves to 66.115.182.22 which has 131 known sex domains). This means that on my site, the spam can get through but the adult site is blocked by the (mandatory) web proxy...
When the mail server has near unlimited resources, spamassassin (V4.0 ?) could be
extended to retrieve URIs (maybe 1 per email message) and
a) do a scan for "spammy words" b) check for referrals and verify if the domains are listed in a database with adult domains
-Marc
I still think this is a good idea.
Careful listing, lower scoring and whitelisting may be required, however it is not unreasonable to expect the bigger spammers to have dedicated hosts and a willingness to keep registering domains, new ips/ip blocks will be harder to come by especially as the number of isps willing to take this kind of business is limited.
So it won't happen.
a small wager ;-)
What is happening is we are getting more
trusted contributors. Domains will be added much more quickly. We used to
have only 3-4 people doing this!
Regards,
Rob
