On Monday, July 19, 2004, 8:00:17 AM, Rakesh wrote: > Please don't mind my query if it seems childish or off the track. I am > little bit confused between SURBL and SpamCop URI checks. I have a high > volume mail relay server and have recently implemented SpamCOP URI > checks and happily catching a great deal of spam.
On behalf of everyone helping with the SURBL project, thanks for your good feedback! > My confusion is "Is SpamCop URI checks and SURBL checks one and the same > thing or SURBL is an extension of SpamCop URI checks". Yes SpamCopURI uses SURBL data. The name "SpamCopURI" was chosen when our only data source was SpamCop's Spamvertised sites. Now we have additional data sources, so the name is perhaps a little misleading, since "SpamCopURI" can be used with the other SURBL lists (which don't use SpamCop data sources) just fine. > Also can I cache the SpamCop URI database Cached locally on a database > on my servers ? Yes. Like other RBLs you can cache (mirror) the SURBL zone files locally. That's definitely a good idea for high volume mail systems. For more information please see: http://www.surbl.org/rsync-signup.html Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
