On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 13:39 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: > OK I guess I should chime in here. First thing SARE is going to do is get > everything working as is right now. RDJ and rate limiter will learn to be > nice to each other :)
FYI, I've uploaded version 1.16 of RDJ which understands 5xx responses as errors (as it should have to begin with). I've also examined the headers returned from the ratelimiter. I noticed that it was actually sending 200 responses even when the rate limiting had taken effect. RDJ took this as the ruleset simply having changed, thus the weird --lint errors with the error page's HTML in it. The rate limiter should now be returning 5xx codes. I think all should be well again for the time being, provided requests are kept down to ~1 per day per system. If you have a special case (such as 3 or more email servers behind a single proxy), you may still have problems. If this is the case, contact me offlist to discuss possible solutions. -- Chris Thielen Easily generate SpamAssassin rules to catch obfuscated spam phrases (0BFU$C/\TED SPA/\/\ P|-|RA$ES): http://www.sandgnat.com/cmos/ Keep up to date with the latest third party SpamAssassin Rulesets: http://www.exit0.us/index.php/RulesDuJour
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
