Thanks for the clarification... I had problems even understanding some of the SPamCopURI instructions, so I just went to SA 3.0 to have it all inclusive...
The hard part wasn't getting it to work, but rather getting Evolution to work with SA correctly. Took a few trials and errors to get the filters right. Just wish Evolution would show the modified headers, so I could directly check the results. Wish lists galore... But thanks for the info, Jeff! On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 14:16, Jeff Chan wrote: > On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 11:25:16 AM, Bill Landry wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ryan Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> Actually, before I go and screw up things, does it look like the > >> following config would work for SA 2.63 (with the surbl plugin installed > >> of course)? > >> > >> http://h0b0.net/surbl.cf.txt > > > I haven't actually tried this, but my understanding is that the spamcopuri > > plug-in for SA 2.63 does not support the bitmask requirement of the > > multi.surbl.org list. However, I do see that there is a new spamcopuri > > plug-in (version 0.19) dated July 20, 2004 up on SourceForge. Don't know > > what new functionality this plug-in might support since I have not seen an > > announcement for it yet. > > Here's the change log for SpamCopURI 0.19: > > 0.19 Wed Jul 21 08:56:57 PDT 2004 > - fix for hex-encoded urls that have a port > - skipping open_redirect tests until reliable open_redirector is found > > (The main change from an installer's point of view is that > those redirect test warning messages mentioned recently > should no longer occur since the tests are skipped.) > > SpamCopURI and therefore SpamAssassin 2.63 do not currently have > support for multi.surbl.org. Only SA 3.0 does, using the command > urirhssub, as described on the SURBL Quick Start (home) page. > > You can get most of the same effect of multi (lacking the > phishing list which is only available in multi) simply by > having multiple SpamCopURI rules and scores referencing > the different lists individually, as in: > > uri SPAMCOP_URI_RBL > eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('sc.surbl.org','127.0.0.2') > describe SPAMCOP_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in spamcop database at > sc.surbl.org > tflags SPAMCOP_URI_RBL net > > uri WS_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('ws.surbl.org','127.0.0.2') > describe WS_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in sa-blacklist > tflags WS_URI_RBL net > > uri OB_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('ob.surbl.org','127.0.0.2') > describe OB_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in ob.surbl.org > tflags OB_URI_RBL net > > uri AB_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('ab.surbl.org','127.0.0.2') > describe AB_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in ab.surbl.org > tflags AB_URI_RBL net > > score SPAMCOP_URI_RBL 4.0 > score WS_URI_RBL 3.0 > score OB_URI_RBL 4.0 > score AB_URI_RBL 4.0 > > This is also on the Quick Start, though not mentioned together > like this. > > Hope this helps, > > Jeff C. -- David A. Bartmess Software Configuration Manager / Sr. Software Developer eDingo Enterprises http://edingo.net _________________________________________________________________ jSyncManager Development Team (http://www.jsyncmanager.org) jSyncManager Email List (https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsyncmanager-devel) But one should not forget that money can buy a bed but not sleep, finery but not beauty, a house but not a home, medicine but not health, luxuries but not culture, sex but not love, and amusements but not happiness.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
