Almost poetic. Thank you.
I can certainly accept the arguments as to why bouncing would be a bad idea.
What is the alternative? If the messages are simply dropped, the sender
(nor the recipient) have any knowledge in the case of a false positive.
- Jon
on 8/7/04 10:32 AM, jdow at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please attire your self in your asbestos longjohns, Jon.
>
> You are destined for that special place reserved where it is VERY hot.
> It is right along side the special place reserved for spammers. But it
> has some special properties reserved for tweebles who spam by bouncing
> spam. The joejobbers love you, and saw you coming. Most of the junk in
> your mailbox is from phony addresses. or worse from innocent people on
> the junkmailer's lists. I have issued a very powerful and arcane curse
> that is automatically laid on people who bounce spam.
>
> {O.O} Joanne, who declares that there ARE worse people than spammers
> or politicians. They're people who bounce viruses or spam that
> should be simply dropped into the infinite bit bucket.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jon Fullmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> (Timidly, Jon answers): uh,... yes?
>>
>> on 8/7/04 8:54 AM, Michele: Blacknight Solutions at
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat 07 Aug 2004 15:41, Jon Fullmer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Right now, I have my action_bounce message including only the total
> score
>>>> [$hits]. This is the way I would like to keep it, as I would rather
> not
>>>> give actual spammers more information to circumvent my system.
>>> Are you actually bouncing spam?? Please tell me I misread that
>>>
>
