Steven Dickenson wrote:
> Reject at SMTP time.
> 
> Exim+Exiscan-ACL does this very well.

This is EXACTLY what MIMEDefang's action_bounce() call does- it issues a
negative response after the DATA segment.

However, if the message is being passed in to your system by a
(relatively) innocent relay server- rather than from direct-to-MX
ratware- that relay will then generate the potentially joe-jobbing DSN.

The way I see it, I've already spent network and processing resources to
accept the message and determine that it's probably spam;  I might as
well deliver it somewhere locally and either let the nominally intended
recipient poke through their spam folder if they suspect an FP, or drop
it in a semi-centralized administrative spam folder as a number of
others have suggested.

The only systems I'll actually reject mail from are those that have
consistently shown themselves to be poorly configured in some way- one
system recently got the booby prize of an entry in a server's firewall
because it kept trying to resend the same message once (or more) per
SECOND.

There aren't many of these blocked systems- on the systems I administer
at work, because I work for an ISP and I *MUST* accept a lot of mail I
might not otherwise consider acceptable (and one system is two or three
relays deep inside our network, so rejecting is just silly);  and on my
personal server because I've yet to have anyone really piss me off that
far.

-kgd
-- 
Get your mouse off of there!  You don't know where that email has been!

Reply via email to