On 04 Aug 2004, at 08:45, Darren Coleman wrote:
I'm surprised no one has mentioned 1.0.25.

Someone has.

Taking into consideration the points already mentioned (which I agree
with) regarding "cartoony" logos, 1.0.25 stands out for me as being a
very sharp, bright, attractive, professional and modern design.

It looks, as I said, very AOL to me, and in 3-5 years it will scream "early '00's" in the same way that legwarmers and rat-tails scream 1987.

Not only that but it describes pictorially exactly what SA does

I didn't think it was clear at all what it was supposed to represent.

itself - it's not like the feather actually *means* anything.

A logo doesn't need to MEAN anything though, it just needs to be clear. I really don't think 1.0.25 is clear.

--
I wrote this song two hours before we met. I didn't know your name, or what you looked like yet....


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to