On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:04:30 -0400 Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:58 PM 8/11/2004, Josh Trutwin wrote: > >I tried to run spamc against the sample spam message in the SA > >distribution but none of the new rules turned up. Is there a > >recommended way to test SpamCopURI or do I have to wait until I get > >spammed? :) > > http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#testpoints Excellent, thanks Jeff and Matt, this is pretty cool. Here's a snip of my test message: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-57.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RDNS2, SPAMCOP_URI_RBL,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=2.64 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This message is a test: http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point-REMUNGED.com/
