Jeff Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 5:10:00 PM, Ryan Thompson wrote:<snip>
We have 28 name servers around the world, with some more in the works. We also have or will have multiple redundant rsync servers, and we do want larger installations to use rsync instead of the public name servers. Large installation means processing more than 100k messages per day.
Jeff C.
We are currently handling 250k a day in messages with about 30% using SA. Do you have information available on the setup required for large sites?
We would certainly like to go this route as there is a great possibility that our SA setup will soon become an opt-out system with our users. We have already gone this route with AV scanning as a way to protect our own network.
I would also entertain the possibility of becoming an alternate/regional site for others. We have a few spare Sparc 20s lying around that could become servers for answering SURBL queries. It's time our management repaid their opensource debt back to the community ;^)
DAve
