On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 04:32:03PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > change in how it works now? I have the feeling that it (3.0 RC1 and RC2) > shows less "99" than with 2.63, but that's only a feeling from a few days > of a test run. But still the BAYES_99 is quite accurate when it shows up. > I know I can change that score, but I'm curious why it is so low now.
You can read the wiki for why scores get generated the way they do.
As for BAYES_00 and BAYES_99, they're by far my most hit rules for
ham/spam respectively:
1 BAYES_00 6953 93.35%
1 BAYES_99 58233 87.46%
I don't have stats for 2.6x, but there's nothing wrong with those
percentages IMO.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
*** The previous line contains the naughty word "$&".\n
if /(ibm|apple|awk)/; # :-)
-- Larry Wall in the perl man page
pgpKO7y1iUlU8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
