On Sunday, August 29, 2004, 10:04:35 AM, Theo Dinter wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 08:47:59AM -0700, Bill Landry wrote: >> Is this correct, that custom rule scores and URIDNSBL scores are ignored by >> bayes auto-learning? If so, what's the rational behind this? Is this true >> for both SA 2.6x and SA 3.0? [...]
> As for head vs body ... > The details of head/body can get into a long discussion (see below) > since it's slightly complex. In short, URIBL rules are considered > header tests and are added appropriately. (I'm not 100% sure why they're > written as "header:eval" instead of "body:eval", but that's a different > discussion... actually, I've opened ticket 3734 about that.) [...] > The URIBL_* rules are are "header" rules, and they're not considered > "RBL", so they should be considered definite "head" rules. To be honest, I'm not really familiar with SA architecture, but it naively seems that URI tests should be considered "body" rules. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
