>> Assuming that you're training only on any mistakes & unsures, then >> both ham and spam should be set to default to 'discard' anyway. Is >> it really that much of a problem to have these in the list when they >> don't cause any extra work? > > Well, that does only apply if the assumption is valid. I prefer to > always train everything to keep my filter up2date.
Research has shown, in every case, that this will give you inferior results to training on errors & unsures only. >> So write one and submit a patch. However, you're wrong. Have you >> read the comments from Mark that are linked to from that FAQ entry? >> They discuss the difficulty of adding whitelisting (he's talking >> about adding to the Outlook plug-in, but it mostly all applies to >> sb_server as well). > > OK, my fault, i think i overrated the abilities of the developers. Being insulting is certainly not the way to convince people to do something for you. You didn't answer the question - have you read Mark's comments? Do you have solutions for the problems that he outlines? =Tony.Meyer -- Please always include the list (spambayes at python.org) in your replies (reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/writing/reply_all.html explains this. _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
