Felix Buenemann wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Am 20.10.2008 20:01 Uhr, Eric Shubert schrieb: >> BTW, couldn't the script simply test for "@" in the first position of >> any line to determine that it's not a syslog, so the flag wouldn't be >> necessary? Seems simpler to me. > This was done to avoid a performance hit of about 20% caused by the more > complex regex. However I've now rewritten the detection code, so it's > much faster, so the attached version no longer needs (or supports) the > --(no)syslog switch. > >> -- -Eric 'shubes' > -- Felix >
Nice. Here's my present result, for all logs: # time cat /var/log/qmail/smtp/*.s | ./spamdyke-stats.pl 34229 DENIED_RDNS_MISSING 26702 DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS 21848 DENIED_RBL_MATCH -- Breakdown -- --------------- 19514 ALLOWED 14910 DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE 2684 DENIED_SENDER_NO_MX 2123 DENIED_OTHER 141 TIMEOUT 3 DENIED_TOO_MANY_RECIPIENTS Allowed: 19514 Denied : 102499 Errors : 141 Total : 122154 % Valid: 15.97% % Spam : 83.91% % Error: 0.12% real 0m15.928s user 0m4.512s sys 0m3.616s I'm a little confused by the Breakdown in the middle of results. Is the sort not working quite right? Here's what I'd prefer to see as output format: spamdyke-stats.pl v??? Total : 122154 Allowed: 19514 15.97% Timeout: 141 0.12% Denied : 102499 83.91% ____Denied Breakdown____ RDNS_MISSING 34229 33.39% IP_IN_CC_RDNS 26702 26.05% RBL_MATCH 21848 21.32% RDNS_RESOLVE 14910 14.55% SENDER_NO_MX 2684 2.62% OTHER 2123 2.07% TOO_MANY_RECIPIENTS 3 0.00% Or something along those lines. ;) Note the Denied percentages are percents of Denied, not percents of Total. Thanks for your great work on this, Felix. Oh, and one more thing just occurred to me. What about greylist rejections? I'm guessing that these numbers don't take greylisting into account. That would seem to be a bit complicated. Can someone think of a way to account for greylist rejections without complicating things too much? I wonder if Sam couldn't adjust the log messages in such a way that greylisting could be accounted for. Upon further thought, it seems to me that this subject might have been discussed before on the list. Sorry if I'm bringing up a dead horse. -- -Eric 'shubes' _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
