@Eric: Nope, the entries in question was too young so qtp-prune-graylist never touched them. I'm quite sure that this is a bug/feature of SpamDyke.
@Sam: No, I can't think of a reason why a message should be accepted without a recipient username. (I don't know the RCFs by heart so this is a common sense reply.) Hans * Eric Shubert <e...@shubes.net> [2010-02-28]: > Is this perhaps the result of running qtp-prune-graylist? The script > presently only takes one shot at pruning empty directories, which could > leave empty directories at higher levels. I'm beginning to think I > should fix this if it causes config-test to throw errors. What do you > think Sam? > > Sam Clippinger wrote: > > Looks like a bug. Unless anyone can think of any reason why a message > > should be accepted without a recipient username...? > > > > -- Sam Clippinger > > > > On 2/25/10 4:24 AM, Hans F. Nordhaug wrote: > >> * Hans F. Nordhaug<hans.f.nordh...@himolde.no> [2010-02-14]: > >> > >>> * Sam Clippinger<s...@silence.org> [2010-02-13]: > >>> > >>>> Messages with an empty sender address are legal -- they are typically > >>>> used for bounce messages. Because of that, spamdyke will allow them. > >>>> > >>>> However, messages with empty usernames (e.g. "@example.com") are not > >>>> legal and should not be allowed. This could indicate a bug in > >>>> spamdyke... is there any chance you still have the mail log entries that > >>>> correspond to those addresses? It would be very handy to see what was > >>>> actually sent with those messages. > >>>> > >>> I didn't have the a log entry for the example I posted, but I ran the > >>> config test again and looked for some newer problems. I looked at the > >>> following error. > >>> > >>> ERROR(graylist-level): Unable to read graylist sender directory > >>> /var/spamdyke/graylist/kompakt.no/modulonet.fr/ezewuehuuw1728:irectory > >>> ERROR(graylist-level): Failed to create file in directory: > >>> /var/spamdyke/graylist/kompakt.no/gvt.net.br/vuaqanipos2110/spamdyk266176143_28737: > >>> Not a directory > >>> > >>> The corresponding entry in the SMTP log: > >>> > >>> 02-02 21:07:44 spamdyke[31368]: DENIED_GRAYLISTED from: > >>> ezewuehuuw1...@modulonet.fr to: @kompakt.no origin_ip: 85.68.111.68 > >>> origin_rdns: abo-68-111-68.mrs.modulonet.fr auth: (unknown) > >>> > >>> So it seems this might be a bug in Spamdyke or? > >>> > >> Sam, you never replied to this. Is it a bug or a feature? > >> > >> Hans _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
