Ok, That seems to have done the trick. I received an email from the client.
I bumped it up to 128M.

Thanks
Ron

On 6/9/2011 10:12 AM, Sam Clippinger wrote:
> 20M seems kinda low for "softlimit".  Try increasing the number to see
> if that makes a difference -- for example, add another zero (200M) and
> retest.  On my own server, "softlimit" is set to 80M.
>
> Don't forget to restart the service after making the change. :)
>
> -- Sam Clippinger
>
> On 6/9/11 7:13 AM, ron wrote:
>> OS is Centos 5.6
>> Linux kernel is 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5
>> Server is a DL380 G4
>> Centos runs under VMWare ESXi 4.0
>>
>> Here is the "run" file.
>>
>> #!/bin/sh
>> QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
>> NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
>> MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
>> SPAMDYKE="/usr/local/bin/spamdyke"
>> SPAMDYKE_CONF="/etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf"
>> SMTPD="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd"
>> TCP_CDB="/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp.cdb"
>> HOSTNAME=`hostname`
>> VCHKPW="/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw"
>> REQUIRE_AUTH=0
>>
>> exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 20000000 \
>>         /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c "$MAXSMTPD" \
>>         -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \
>>         $SPAMDYKE --config-file $SPAMDYKE_CONF \
>>         $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 2>&1
>>
>> On 6/8/2011 4:50 PM, Sam Clippinger wrote:
>>
>>> OK, I'll try to run back through this thread and respond to the various
>>> questions in one email...
>>>
>>> To turn off TLS in spamdyke, you can do one of several things.  You can
>>> prohibit both spamdyke and qmail from using TLS by using this option:
>>>         tls-level=none
>>> Or you can simply remove/comment out the tls-certificate-file option to
>>> allow spamdyke to pass encrypted traffic through to qmail.  That will
>>> bypass some of spamdyke's filters but would allow you to continue to
>>> receive encrypted email.
>>>
>>> spamdyke does not implement TLS or SSL on its own, it just calls the
>>> installed OpenSSL library for encryption/decryption as needed.  The
>>> version you have installed looks fine to me (my own server has 0.9.7f
>>> installed) and since TLS works with qmail, it should work with
>>> spamdyke.  From the headers you sent, it looks like the remote server is
>>> running Windows Server 2003, probably with Exchange 2003.  I correspond
>>> regularly with clients on that same setup (as you did before installing
>>> spamdyke), so I doubt the remote server is at fault.
>>>
>>> By default, spamdyke specifies the cipher list as "DEFAULT" (unless you
>>> override that with the "tls-cipher-list" option).  The meaning of
>>> "DEFAULT" depends on your version of OpenSSL and the way it was
>>> compiled.  Typically, it includes all of the usable ciphers that aren't
>>> known to be too weak or too computationally expensive.  See this page
>>> for more details:
>>>         http://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/ciphers.html#CIPHER_STRINGS
>>>
>>> Overall, I don't see anything wrong with your configuration file.  I'm
>>> curious to know what OS, version and architecture you're using.  My #1
>>> suspicion is that spamdyke is running out of memory.  Can you check your
>>> "run" file where the spamdyke command line is located and look for the
>>> "softlimit" command?  Try doubling/tripling that number and see if this
>>> problem persists (don't forget to restart tcpserver after you change the
>>> "run" file).
>>>         http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/FAQ.html#TROUBLE9
>>>
>>> -- Sam Clippinger
>>>
>>> On 6/8/11 3:03 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>>>
>>>> The first cipher listed is the same one that qmail used with a
>>>> successful transmission.
>>>>
>>>> Looks to me from all of this that there is a bug in spamdyke with
>>>> regards to that particular remote server software and TLS.
>>>>
>>>> I think this is the point where Sam can best continue helping to debug
>>>> this situation.
>>>>
>>>> Sam?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to