Funny, based on my own empirical evidence, Barracuda Central's DNSBL yields the best results. As with anything on the Internet, be skeptical and collect your own data.
Доверяй, но проверяй (doveryai, no proveryai). *** 9373 92.80% DENIED_RBL_MATCH --------------- Breakdown --------------- 6956 81.35% b.barracudacentral.org 878 10.26% cbl.abuseat.org 561 6.56% bl.spamcop.net 154 1.80% dnsbl.sorbs.net 1 0.01% opm.tornevall.org ----------------------------------------- 329 3.25% ALLOWED 183 1.81% DENIED_GRAYLISTED 142 1.40% TIMEOUT 68 0.67% ERROR 5 0.04% DENIED_RELAYING ---------------- Summary ---------------- Allowed: 329 3.25% Timeout: 142 1.40% Errors : 68 0.67% Denied : 9561 94.66% Total : 10100 100.00% On 3/8/14 9:36 AM, Lutz Petersen wrote: >> > What is wrong with barracuda? You said it isn't "relevant". What >> > does that mean? > The barracuda list is not maintained as the other lists. > > Beware - ist needs _huge_ manpower to produce good lists. Spamhaus > and Spamcop have worldwide offices working 24/7. Barracuda not; > the only usage of Barracuda is within SpamAssin. -- Dossy Shiobara | "He realized the fastest way to change do...@panoptic.com | is to laugh at your own folly -- then you http://panoptic.com/ | can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) * WordPress * jQuery * MySQL * Security * Business Continuity * _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
