Does this mean that I will be able to successfully compile a 2.6 kernel using gcc 3.3.5 on my sparc64 gentoo box? Yeah!
now.. If only I (or someone) could fix the fcal/socal driver. I even tried using the socal_asm.h firmware patch derived from the Solaris 10 "socal" firmware. No luck. :( --- William Lee Irwin III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 01:44:40PM -0800, Andrew > Morton wrote: > > Thanks. Many of these fixups are due to a > 64-bit-resource patch in Greg's > > bk-pci tree which he has now reverted. That being > said: > > - That patch will come back sometime > > - Fixes like the below make sense anyway and can > be merged any time. > > - All the fixes which were only applicable when > the 64-bit-resource patch > > is present have been sent to Greg for when that > patch reemerges. > > Well, in isolation it's a C99 initializer cleanup, > which is good. > > Acked-by: William Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- wli > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line > "unsubscribe sparclinux" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ===== Dennis Jenkins - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
