>From jim Tue May 30 05: 00:52 2000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.bear-cave.org.uk with esmtp
(Exim 3.14 #1) id 12wdD2-0005Xs-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Tue, 30 May 2000 05:00:52 +0100
X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 30 00:05:05 2000
Received: from pop.pol.net.uk by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.3.7) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (multi-drop); Tue, 30 May 2000 05:00:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [199.222.69.4] (helo=mail.acm.org) by mail13.svr.pol.co.uk with
esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 12wYan-0006M6-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Tue, 30 May 2000 00:05:05 +0100
Received: from lml.valinux.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [198.186.203.19]) by
mail.acm.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA24142;
Mon, 29 May 2000 19:02:56 -0400
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu (vger.rutgers.edu [128.6.190.2]) by
lml.valinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683985AE40;
Mon, 29 May 2000 16:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id <S156343AbQE2WvW>;
Mon, 29 May 2000 18:51:22 -0400
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <S156349AbQE2WvH>;
Mon, 29 May 2000 18:51:07 -0400
Received: from [216.88.157.130] ([216.88.157.130]:63299 "EHLO anton") by
vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <S156397AbQE2WtO>;
Mon, 29 May 2000 18:49:14 -0400
Received: from anton by anton with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id
12wYJI-0007ll-00; Mon, 29 May 2000 15:47:00 -0700
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 09:26:38 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, May 29, 2000 at 06:53:27PM +0200
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Orcpt: rfc822;sparclinux-outgoing
From: Anton Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: root
Subject: Re: 2.4.0-test1-ac4 (was: 2.3.99-pre9 not booting to completion)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On a Sparc 5 it seems that both 2.3.99-pre9 and 2.4.0-test1-ac4
> fail on mounting /proc during init.
> 2.3.99-pre9 did not output anything
> 2.4.0-test1-ac4 invokes a watchdog:
Im am in the middle of a rather large sparc32 cleanup. I have held a lot
of my patches (sbus/iommu rewrite, highmem support) back until I fix
the caching stuff. Hopefully sparc32 will back to working condition soon.
> This machine has once run 2.3.99-pre3 for a day. I recall that it had
> an empty /proc/openprom as opposed to 2.2.1{4,5} kernels.
/proc/openprom is now a filesystem. You can mount it from your /etc/fstab:
none /proc/openprom openpromfs defaults 0 0
Cheers,
Anton
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of the message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of the message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
