Just read this post and though I'd check our wine ReAdW output vs native XP using diff. Like Jeffrey we're using Trapper and ReAdW on Ubuntu (10.04 LTS), wine version 1.2. Were previously using it on Ubuntu 9.04 for over a year, with whatever version of wine that had. Never had any problems using the MzXMLs converted through wine, and it's *very* nice to be able to do it on a fast server directly connected to the main data storage array rather than on a windows desktop.
sha1 hashes for the files are different, but diff shows that the only differences are: 1) parentFile tag has a different filename attribute (since the .RAW is in a different place) 2) all of the <offset> values are sightly different, because the parentFile filename attribute is a few bytes different 3) <indexOffset> is different (again due to the filename difference) 4) <sha1> is different due to the above differences between the files. Other than this the wine version and windows version of the mzXML are identical. No differences at all in any of the markup or encoded spectra other than for the tags listed above. Cheers, DT On Oct 14, 11:47 pm, Natalie Tasman <natalie.tas...@insilicos.com> wrote: > Have you done comparisons between mzXML output from your WINE > installation and a native Windows environment? I would expect that > there will be some subtle but important differences between the two. > Like I've said before on this list, and as Matt stated on this thread, > if you have this working 100% completely it's the first time it's been > reported. Nice job if so. > > -Natalie > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Jeffrey Milloy > > <jeffrey.a.mil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > XCalibur and ReAdW have been running in wine for more than two years > > now, through several ubuntu upgrades and wine updates. Seems totally > > stable, although now I'm hesitant to update XCalibur and ReADdW to > > current versions! This is one reason why I figure this is a reasonably > > route for adding my own functionality. > > > On Oct 14, 2:06 pm, Matthew Chambers <matt.chamber...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> I wouldn't recommend getting your hopes up on using XRawfile (a COM > >> interface to an MFC library) with Wine. I have not heard of anyone able to > >> do this and > >> reproduce it reliably on other machines. It may only work with a narrow > >> set of Wine versions, kernel version, x86 emulation, etc. Your time would > >> probably be > >> better spent creating a true Windows VM to do this. On the other hand, if > >> anybody is able to do this reliably and I just haven't heard about it, I > >> sure would > >> like to know. > > >> -Matt > > >> On 10/14/2010 12:56 PM, Jeffrey Milloy wrote: > > >> > I'm having a hard time building tpp. My interest in the tpp source is > >> > in reading XRawfile metadata using c++. If anyone has a different > >> > suggestion for using the XRawfile2 DLL with c++ I would be grateful. > >> > C# won't work for me because I want to run the code in wine/mono and > >> > CSLID is not supported in mono. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "spctools-discuss" group. > > To post to this group, send email to spctools-disc...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to spctools-disc...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
