Hi David

I've added the files on this drive link:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1hnR2igUXM_K-Pld2xspikeu_xnLGUdMc?usp=sharing

Let me know if you have any issues accessing the files!

-Shagun
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 1:34:57 PM UTC-4 David Shteynberg wrote:

> Please place your files on a shared drive and send me a link.
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 10:34 AM Shagun Gupta <sg2...@cornell.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi David
>>
>> Could you suggest a good email to reach you with? I can share the 
>> pep.xml's and Libra condition file that way?
>>
>> -Shagun
>>
>> On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 11:00:38 AM UTC-4 David Shteynberg wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Shagun,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your email and interest in the TPP.  I have recently been 
>>> comparing TMTPro analysis by ProteomeDiscoverer and Byonic to that produced 
>>> by TPP's Libra.  As far as I can tell, when I run and compare the 
>>> quantities (intensities) they are mostly the same between Libra (without 
>>> isotopic impurity correction and 0 pseudocounts) and the 
>>> ProteomeDiscoverer/Byonic.  Execution of Libra is defined in the 
>>> conditions.xml file that has to be defined for each Libra run.  I would be 
>>> happy to take a look at your data and analysis to see if it can be placed 
>>> on the right path for the Libra analysis to work.  Please post your results 
>>> somewhere I can download and test.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -David
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:36 AM Shagun Gupta <sg2...@cornell.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> Our lab has been trying to use Libra to quantify MS2 (Ion-trap) 
>>>> identification and MS3-based quantification of TMT datasets and we were 
>>>> trying to benchmark with an artificial yeast and mammalian spiked dataset 
>>>> with known fold-change (FC) values. However we observe drastically 
>>>> different values than expected, something we don't observe with other 
>>>> search engines for the same dataset. 
>>>>
>>>> Has this issue been encountered before/ is there something obviously 
>>>> wrong when running with TPP that might cause this? Happy to provide 
>>>> further 
>>>> details on the dataset and parameters used to run with (most of them 
>>>> default apart from additions like static modification for TMT and 
>>>> specification of MS3 for quantification among others).
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Shagun
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/ce2c75fb-2da1-4e05-8d08-bbe5a30b0495n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/ce2c75fb-2da1-4e05-8d08-bbe5a30b0495n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "spctools-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/7a0b1188-7c5f-4528-9e90-282b860e7627n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/7a0b1188-7c5f-4528-9e90-282b860e7627n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/0642c7aa-670d-4a5f-b1b2-ba875f3e861dn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to