If this can help, we have tracked in ScanCode all the 15 known text variations to date: https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/search?p=1&q=%22this+Commitment+to+be+irrevocable%22&unscoped_q=%22this+Commitment+to+be+irrevocable%22 -- Philippe On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 7:54 PM J Lovejoy <opensou...@jilayne.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I know I just wrote in the minutes that this task was on Richard F, but I was > too curious not to have a cursory look myself! > > Attached is a compare of the project to corporate variant; and of the > individual to project variant. The main difference seem to be: > - in the use of pronouns (I, We, name of coroporation) - easily accommodated > with markup. > - likewise, the associated definition of We or the corporation name, or the > absence of a definition for individual at the end > - likewise, lead-in text for the individual version clarifying it only > applies to their sole copyright > - there is also an additional term that the corporate variant has about the > ability to modify the commitment by posting a new edition - this is not > included at all in the project or individual variants. I think this could be > omitable in some way? if a cooperation did make a modified version, then it > would not match > > > Interested to hear other thoughts. This will still need some expert markup > attention!! > > > Jilayne > > > >
-- Cordially Philippe Ombredanne +1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com DejaCode - What's in your code?! - http://www.dejacode.com AboutCode - Open source for open source - https://www.aboutcode.org nexB Inc. - http://www.nexb.com -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#2450): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/2450 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/28502129/21656 Group Owner: spdx-legal+ow...@lists.spdx.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
