If distros are seeing packaged-but-not-identified licenses
in numbers to the point of pain, I'd suggest addressing that
pain directly.  Perhaps by laying a wider pipe from distros'
workflows to SPDX's.

>From personal experience, the biggest blocks might actually
be the XML schema and just reading through all the process
doc.  If SPDX had a special track for identification based
on calls from popular distros, and the distros could submit
plain text terms and have them formatted for inclusion by
someone else, would that flush the backlog?

I've pushed for new licenses.  There's some contention for
attention.  But I've never been _against_ identification of
any older terms, and they certainly have been, even as some
of mine weren't.  The SPDX list is five hundred-odd
licenses.  If someone cares enough about one more to present
in format for inclusion, without name contention, let it be
five hundred and one.  Especially if that means less human
drudgery somewhere else.

As for motivations, I've sever seen SPDX identification as
approval.  I don't expect it's ever made a license popular.
And I've yet to meet any dev who does.  The proportion of
coders who even know the list exists is tiny. Those who do,
and who've spoken to me, just see a HashMap, akin to a
protocol registry or MIME type list.  Not a license club.
It's clear where those are.

The motivation I've seen and felt comes from where and how
the list has been used.  Not necessarily as originally
intended.  I've brought licenses here because package
manager metadata warnings are annoying.  I take it the
distro people might be irked in similar ways.  Both probably
seem insubstantial, looking over from the other side.  But a
few kB of XML file in a GitHub repo is pretty cheap cure.

-- 
Kyle Mitchell, attorney // Oakland // (510) 712 - 0933


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3307): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/3307
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/96510436/21656
Group Owner: spdx-legal+ow...@lists.spdx.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to