As a follow-up to last week's tech call, I went back through the model and compared it to the instance diagrams.
I found one significant discrepancy - there are not classes or properties to describe a change between SPDX documents. This would affect the patch scenario where one SPDX document is describing changes to files relative to another SPDX document. Proposal: add an optional property to the SPDXElementRelationship class ChangeLog which would contain a description of any files added, deleted, or modified. One issue with this is the property only makes sense for certain relationship types. Perhaps we could discuss on the call. During the review, I noticed that the model has not been updated with the Usage proposal (see http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Technical_Team/Proposals/2012-02-01/Usage_Relation ship_Proposal). I don't remember if we closed on this one - perhaps we could review during today's call. One other item - during the general call, Phil requested a presentation of the SPDX 2.0 model to the general meeting which I agreed to - hope that's OK w/the tech team. I can pull together 4-5 slides for a 15 minute overview with about 15 minutes of discussion and send it out for review by the tech team prior to the next general call. Gary ------------------------------------------------- Gary O'Neall Principal Consultant Source Auditor Inc. Mobile: 408.805.0586 Email: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Spdx-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
