On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 08:18:32PM -0500, Thanh Ha wrote: > The other options available licenseText and standardLicenseTemplate seems > to have the full license header rather than what's recommended by the > Eclipse project to include a short header message [1] in code files. > … > [1] https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#ip-copyright-headers
Besides Gary's comments, another wrinkle is that we currently require headers to be declared in the license or its appendix [1]. We are likely to relax that limitation soon to “declared somewhere by the license steward” [2], but for the moment, the handbook page you link may be too far from the license for inclusion. Cheers, Trevor [1]: https://spdx.org/spdx-license-list/license-list-overview#fields [2]: https://github.com/spdx/license-list/issues/5#issuecomment-307292702 -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Spdx-tech mailing list Spdx-tech@lists.spdx.org https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
