Just one point for now: > > *[Dave]* Bundle (little-d document, non-contextual collection) is the > unit of transfer for multiple independent/unrelated Elements in a single > exchange, such as moving them from the Internet to a closed/internal > environment. The fact of putting a bunch of Elements into a unit of > transfer does not create any logical context/relationship among them. Once > they have been transferred the unit of transfer disappears, leaving no > trace of itself in the transferred set of Elements. If the unit of > transfer is itself intended to become an Element with an IRI after the > transfer is finished, then simply create and transfer a Collection or its > subclass.. > > > > *[WillBar] *Document is intended to have the same purpose of Bundle, > there was weeks of debate across both the 3T-SBOM and SPDX communities > about whether Document should be renamed to Bundle, the decision was made > not to. >
The tech group will need to have a discussion of a new requirement. The previous long discussion was whether to use "Document" or "Bundle" to refer to an Element that has the properties of Element and is now a subclass of Collection. The new proposal is to create a logical model class that is NOT an Element and does not exist in the current logical model. As described above, it has no IRI, no name, no creation info, nothing except the Elements to be transferred. It has the semantics of a STIX "Bundle", not a v2 or v3 "Document", so the previous discussion does not apply. Regards, Dave -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4234): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/4234 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/86776587/21656 Group Owner: spdx-tech+ow...@lists.spdx.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
