On 9/27/06, Dick Hardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Additionally, as we have researched what is contained in registration > forms, this use case does not look like it will be that common. Many > forms have some site specific data, and I am now thinking that this > is not a very useful feature.
I'm glad that we're in agreement on this. > wrt. passthrough data > > Many sites preserve state between forms with hidden values. Given > that registration on a site will likely ask the user for some site > specific data, some sites will likely be maintaining state through > hidden fields, and it will be easier for them to integrate OpenID if > the RP can send values that it gets back later on. Given this is not > explicitly in the spec, we can write it up. Would welcome feedback on > passthrough data. This model is only necessary for sites that do not support sessions, right? Josh _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
